Awesome! You've created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. We'll get in touch soon (usually within a day or two). In the meantime, our automated test system will go ahead and run some checks on your pull request. In a few minutes you'll be notified of the test results.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update the current pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

If you need assistance at any point, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you (feel free to write in Dutch, English, French, German, Portuguese, or Spanish).

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

@adam3smith, just 70 styles! :)

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

@adam3smith, I checked the instructions to authors as much as possible for these styles, although I had to guess some styles. Anyway, I think this is good to go. Please squash and merge.

Cool, thanks. No concerns from my end. Obviously I didn't double-check the actual et-al values, but I have all confidence that you did this as well or better than I'd be able to.

Thanks!

I'm sorry for my rudeness since I'm not a native English speaker, but did you made a mistake when editing chinese-gb7714-1987-numeric.csl and chinese-gb7714-2005-numeric.csl?

In GB/T 7714-1987 and GB/T 7714-2005, the standard specified that the value "et-al-use-first" is ought to be "3". But in this commit you just changed it to 1. Did you mean changing et-al-min to "4" and leaving et-al-use-first unchanged?

Here is a reference of Chinese GB/T 7714-2005 (in Chinese Simplified)