Awesome! You've created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. We'll get in touch soon (usually within a day or two). In the meantime, our automated test system will go ahead and run some checks on your pull request. In a few minutes you'll be notified of the test results.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update the current pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

If you need assistance at any point, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you (feel free to write in Dutch, English, French, German, Portuguese, or Spanish).

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

Thanks!

I created an independent style for the American Nuclear Society and three dependents for their three journals, which appear to all use the same reference style.

Great! I was wondering if I should do it that way or just make the dependents for the nuclear tech style.
Thanks for doing that :)

(a Google search showed that the ANS style appears to be used beyond their journals, so it made sense in this case to give the organization a style and add journal-dependents)