Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: The Basic Model Interface 2.0: A standard interface for coupling numerical models in the geosciences #2280

Open
whedon opened this issue May 31, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator

@whedon whedon commented May 31, 2020

Submitting author: @mdpiper (MARK PIPER)
Repository: https://github.com/csdms/bmi
Version: v2.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewer: Pending
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mdpiper. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mdpiper if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon whedon added the pre-review label May 31, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 31, 2020

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 31, 2020

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.21 s (139.5 files/s, 15882.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
reStructuredText                23            723            562           1152
DOS Batch                        1             34              2            227
make                             1             30              6            156
Python                           2             86            187            122
HTML                             2              1              0             14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            29            874            757           1671
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2280' was gathered on 2020/05/31.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
(no author)                      1          1054              0            6.21
Mark Piper                       4           115            739            5.04
Mike Taves                       1            23             12            0.21
huttone                         21          1296            682           11.66
mcflugen                        53          6189           6849           76.88

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Mark Piper                  113           98.3          1.7                6.19
mcflugen                    282            4.6         36.9               62.77
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 31, 2020

PDF failed to compile for issue #2280 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

@danielskatz
Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented May 31, 2020

@whedon generate pdf from branch mdpiper/paper

@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 31, 2020

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch mdpiper/paper. Reticulating splines etc...
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 31, 2020

@danielskatz
Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented May 31, 2020

👋 @mdpiper - thanks for your submission - we'll get back to you with a next step shortly

@danielskatz
Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented Jun 1, 2020

Note to editors: this was discussed in openjournals/joss#690 before submission

@danielskatz
Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented Jun 1, 2020

👋 @mdpiper - Thanks for your submission to JOSS. As described in our blog post announcing the reopening of JOSS, we're currently working in a "reduced service mode", limiting the number of papers assigned to any individual editor.

Since reopening JOSS about a little more than a week ago, we've had > 60 papers submitted and as such, yours has been put in our backlog that we will be working through over the coming weeks and months. We also are beginning to bring in new editors to move this process along.

Thanks in advance for your patience!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.