Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upPackaging and Sharing #72
Conversation
Added item 6 in the list of Cross-cutting activities.
| @@ -302,6 +302,13 @@ to compensate for the time required to participate. In addition, to increase par | |||
| from a diverse community, URSSI will provide travel support for a small number of workshop | |||
| participants, determined based on need in individual cases. | |||
|
|
|||
| 6. _Packaging and Sharing_ | |||
| As URSSI develops content related to the educational activities described in this chapter, we | |||
| will package that content into Carpentries-style lessons. We will make the content freely | |||
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
karthik
Jun 17, 2020
Member
There is no specific Carpentries format. And we're also not striving to make these into 4 hour modules. So I'd skip this since it is not a thing.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JeffCarver
Jun 17, 2020
Author
Contributor
I modified the text to say that we will package them in a shareable format.
| will package that content into Carpentries-style lessons. We will make the content freely | ||
| available on GitHub. We will also archive each release of content on Zenodo using a proper | ||
| license that allows anyone to use and/or modify the content as needed. Finally, we will seek | ||
| to work with the Carpentries to have URSSI content included as Carpentries content. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
karthik
Jun 17, 2020
Member
Are we paying lip service to this or do we really plan to do this? The carpentries cant really take this on without a fte (otherwise we're offering them a free puppy that they have to feed, walk and raise). In the past Library Carpentry came about because of an IMLS grant that pad for a 3 year FTE to coordinate the effort. Other proposed carpentries haven't come together because of lack of proper resources. So unless we're budgeting for this and have a MOU in the works, we should not commit them to doing anything.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
karthik
Jun 17, 2020
•
Member
We can add it later after a discussion with the Carpentries leadership if needed, but for now we shouldn't without an explicit commitment.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JeffCarver
Jun 17, 2020
Author
Contributor
Sounds good. Can I merge this change now or do you have other thoughts?
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Can we say something stronger than what's left? Perhaps we will instigate a community activity to find volunteers (including our staff in some cases) to maintain these lessons? And will work with the carpentries to make sure these fit into their existing material/lessons? |
|
Hey @JeffCarver - I'm not sure why you asked me to review this, but then merged it before I had a chance to comment. |
|
@danielskatz my apologies, @karthik said it was good to merge so I did. If you want to make an edit, please feel free to change it to read stronger. |
|
I think there's a philosophical difference here about if this plan is a commitment or an intention. |
|
Maybe this is something that we should discuss more globally. It likely applies beyond this one issue. I was just going based on @karthik hesitancy to commit the Carpentries to something. But, the text should say whatever the group is comfortable saying. |
|
I think it would be good to discuss. If these are intentions, then we can use language like strive to work with The Carpentries. But we should not state that as a commitment. |
|
this seems good to me |
JeffCarver commentedJun 17, 2020
Added item 6 in the list of Cross-cutting activities.
Closes #61