Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create ROADMAP.md #684

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from
Open

Create ROADMAP.md #684

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 15, 2020

👋 @openjournals/joss-editors @openjournals/joss-eics @openjournals/dev @openjournals/jose-editors - this PR is an attempt to capture in a single document a backlog of priority items for JOSS/JOSE, Whedon, and Whedon-API.

Please take a look and see what you think. I've not listed ever single issue in this doc but I have triaged all outstanding issues into a collection of categories (e.g. author, editor, reviewer improvements).

If there's something not listed as a priority here, please mention that on this PR and I'll open up a new issue and potential add it to the priority list.

@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

arfon commented Feb 15, 2020

One major thing missing here is some kind of reviewer management functionality for JOSS and JOSE. This is a major piece of development that would address many of the issues listed here as priority items. I'll write this up shortly and add it to the roadmap document.

@arfon arfon mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2020
@arfon arfon requested a review from xuanxu Feb 15, 2020
@xuanxu
xuanxu approved these changes Feb 16, 2020
Copy link
Member

xuanxu left a comment

👍

Copy link
Member

terrytangyuan left a comment

Looks great! Exciting!

@danielskatz

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

danielskatz commented Feb 16, 2020

Is hiding the potential reviewer list embedded in here somewhere?

@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

arfon commented Feb 16, 2020

Yes, this is what I was alluding to in my first comment. The new reviewer management feature will allow us to take this offline permanently.

@kyleniemeyer kyleniemeyer self-requested a review Feb 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.